I’m going to start this off by asking that my loved ones who recognize the situation below make no comment. I will not be giving any identifying information because my aim is to educate and nothing more, and I will definitely strike down any public comment that doesn’t honor the spirit of that.
Once upon a time- when doesn’t matter here- I objected to a therapy program being used with our son. We were seeing behavioral regressions that in my opinion were directly related to the programming being used. Please be aware that opinions on either side are not facts nor am I presenting them as such. The official position from the provider involved is that they cannot say what was causing the regressions but they believe wholeheartedly in the programming. I can truly say that I do believe them to be very sincere in their belief in the ability of this programming to benefit our son when they recommended trying it. And I will also add that I don’t personally challenge programming without a sincere belief that a change needs to be made to ensure our son’s progress.
When I challenged the programming after behavioral regressions of a very concerning nature started to appear, my recollection from a meeting to discuss the matter was that initially I was told there would be no modifications and that if I wanted something different I could go somewhere else. I brought in outside agencies because it was our son’s desire at that time to continue working with the provider, and the provider involved was willing to negotiate some changes at that point, but then added the following condition:
Any provider who has ever worked with our son knows that more than 5 days in a row of stalled progress are common before he will pick back up and resume an upward trend. Not only is motor planning an issue for him, sometimes if he’s very upset about something he’ll just stop cooperating with therapy tasks for a period of time. In the opinion of our family (and again, opinions are not facts), it was a condition which seemed designed to force him out of services with that provider.
What does a condition like that do to any trust the family might have? How would the individuals involved feel if they were on the receiving end, and more importantly, would they have wanted to see the same thing happening for them or their child?
The truth of the matter is I have darker things than this I could put up screenshots for. And certainly I have had providers who we sought to receive care from look at Tony’s level of functioning or his behavioral challenges and decline the case. How all of that emotionally feels is, honestly, it’s pretty rough sometimes. But as I have been listening to the beautiful sentiments of Laura Pausini lately in her song “En Cambio No,” what I would prefer to focus on is just how thankful I am for the providers who have stood by us and with us, who have looked at my son and seen that he has good things to offer the people around him. In my opinion when somebody does something like that, they are not going to see me, my perspective, or my needs anyway no matter how many screenshots I put up before the world, and in my opinion they aren’t showing that they care about the true needs of our son or our family.
Everybody is a person here. Any provider can refuse to be involved and I respect that. And if you are a parent just starting on this journey with an individual deemed lower functioning, it’s probably the last thing you want to hear because you might be feeling desperate for help. I get it because I have felt that way too. But still you need to understand this could be what your journey looks like, because you may have no choice but to do what I have done and spend a lot of time educating yourself about different therapy techniques so that you can step in to fill any gaps and help your child reach towards the potential within them.